115 年 國立臺灣大學翻譯碩士學程乙組《口譯基本議題》
第 1 題50 分
Technology has become integral to the entire interpreting workflow, from advance preparation and in-process performance to post-process tasks. Please analyze these three phases by addressing the following:
- Identify the core elements and specific challenges inherent to each phase.
- Discuss the traditional approaches used to handle these challenges.
- Explain how technology has been, or can be, integrated to enhance the process at each stage.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
本題主要在探討科技在口譯工作流程中各階段（譯前準備、執行中表現、譯後處理）的應用與影響。作答時需針對每個階段，分析其核心要素、固有挑戰、傳統處理方式，以及科技如何介入以提升效率。
核心觀念： 口譯工作流程的階段性分析、科技在專業領域的應用、挑戰與對策。
解題步驟：
-
階段分析與挑戰識別：
- 譯前準備 (Advance Preparation)：
- 核心要素： 術語研究、主題研究、背景資訊蒐集、聽力材料準備、預講稿分析、建立術語庫。
- 挑戰： 資訊量龐大、主題陌生、術語定義不一、時間壓力、高科技或專業領域的術語難度。
- 執行中表現 (In-process Performance)：
- 核心要素： 聽取、理解、記憶、轉換、輸出。
- 挑戰： 聽力負荷、記憶負荷、即時壓力、語速過快、口音、演講者失誤、突發狀況（如設備問題）、保持專注與體力。
- 譯後處理 (Post-process Tasks)：
- 核心要素： 聽打、校對、編輯、潤飾、存檔、術語庫更新、回饋。
- 挑戰： 聽打耗時費力、確保翻譯精確性與流暢性、處理口語化的表達、與客戶溝通確認、檔案管理。
- 譯前準備 (Advance Preparation)：
-
傳統處理方式：
- 譯前準備： 仰賴紙本字典、書籍、資料夾、個人筆記、與客戶面談。
- 執行中表現： 純粹依靠口譯員自身的聽、說、思能力，以及長時間的訓練與經驗。
- 譯後處理： 手動聽寫、人工校對、紙本編輯、口頭回饋。
第 2 題50 分
歐洲議會全體會議(European Parliament plenary sessions)之發言型態多屬「照稿朗讀」,故口譯模式常以「帶稿同步口譯」進行,而會議紀錄之筆譯文本係根據修訂後之演說逐字稿編修而成。下方兩欄文本為某義大利議員發言之英文會議記錄筆譯文本與同步口譯逐字稿,其原始訊息內容完全相同。請比較口譯(口語)與筆譯(書面語)用詞與句構之差異,並從中歸納出同步口譯的常用策略。
Translation (Written text from the meeting minutes)
Mr President, first of all I would like to clarify Mr Abitbol's speech a little: Mr Berlusconi has never said that the euro is blocking the economy, but he has said something else, which is that the introduction of the euro has led to bursts of speculation, which definitely must be eliminated.
The recovery of the economy which began in 2002 showed itself to be short-lived and it certainly did not trigger a sufficiently powerful trend towards economic growth. Amongst other things, the European Union has seen an increase in unemployment and a gradual weakening of public finances. At the same time, the strong euro has created difficulties for exports and the trend of slowly falling inflation has caused consumption to reach a standstill. On the basis of the examination of these problems, we must ask ourselves whether the rigidity of the Stability and Growth Pact might have had a negative effect on the growth in productivity and on the increase in employment. In order to improve the flexibility of the labour market, we will certainly have to remove the remaining obstacles, adopt the recognition of professional qualifications and establish business incentives linked to productivity. Similarly, programmes seeking to modernise production processes must be stepped up, and it is essential that further investment is channelled into the research and development sectors.
Simultaneous Interpretation (Verbatim transcript of the interpreted speech)
Thank you, President. First of all, an answer to my colleague, Mr. Abitbol. Prime Minister Berlusconi has never said that Europe was holding up the economy. He said something different. He said that when we created the euro, we set up opportunities for speculation, which certainly should be got rid of.
I think that we do not have enough dynamism in our economic growth. We've seen a rise in unemployment, and we've seen a further deterioration in public finances. The strong euro in addition has caused problems with exports and we've seen consumption stagnating as well. So we need to ask ourselves, whether the rigidity of this Pact might have some negative effect on the growth of productivity and the growth in employment. To improve the flexibility of working conditions, there's a lot that we can do. We will have to approve the recognition of professional qualifications and establish business incentives linked to productivity. We also need to focus more on programmes aimed at updating our production processes, and we need to focus more on research and development, too.
Source: European Parliament Interpretation Corpus (EPIC), ELRA catalogue (http://catalog.elra.info), ISLRN: 716-168-855-843-2, ELRA ID: ELRA-S0323.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
本題旨在比較書面文本（筆譯）與口語文本（同步口譯）在用詞和句構上的差異，並從中歸納出同步口譯的常用策略。這是一道典型的口譯實務分析題，需要結合語言學、翻譯學和口譯技巧進行論述。
核心觀念： 書面語與口語的差異、翻譯策略、同步口譯的特點與技巧。
解題步驟：
- 比較用詞與句構差異：
仔細對照兩欄文本，找出具體的語言差異。可從以下幾個面向進行：- 詞彙選擇 (Lexical Choice)：
- 正式 vs. 非正式： 書面語通常較正式，口語則可能較為口語化、簡潔。
- 同義詞替換： 口譯員為了流暢度或因應聽覺理解，可能選用較為常見或易於理解的同義詞。
- 術語處理： 書面語可能使用精確的學術或法律術語，口語則可能簡化或解釋。
- 例句對照：
- "clarify Mr Abitbol's speech a little" (Translation) vs. "an answer to my colleague, Mr. Abitbol." (Interpretation) - 口譯直接切入回應。
- "blocking the economy" (Translation) vs. "holding up the economy" (Interpretation) - 詞彙選擇不同，意義接近。
- "introduction of the euro has led to bursts of speculation" (Translation) vs. "when we created the euro, we set up opportunities for speculation" (Interpretation) - 句構和用詞的轉化，更具動態感。
- "definitely must be eliminated" (Translation) vs. "certainly should be got rid of" (Interpretation) - 語氣和表達方式的差異。
- "showed itself to be short-lived" (Translation) vs. "short-lived" (Interpretation) - 口譯傾向刪減冗餘詞。
- "trigger a sufficiently powerful trend towards economic growth" (Translation) vs. "enough dynamism in our economic growth" (Interpretation) - 概念的轉化，更直接。
- "gradual weakening of public finances" (Translation) vs. "further deterioration in public finances" (Interpretation) - 詞彙選擇。
- "consumption to reach a standstill" (Translation) vs. "consumption stagnating as well" (Interpretation) - 詞彙選擇。
- "rigidity of the Stability and Growth Pact" (Translation) vs. "rigidity of this Pact" (Interpretation) - 簡化指代。
- "growth in productivity and on the increase in employment" (Translation) vs. "growth of productivity and the growth in employment" (Interpretation) - 句構微調。
- "flexibility of the labour market" (Translation) vs. "flexibility of working conditions" (Interpretation) - 概念的微調，可能取決於上下文的具體強調點。
- "remove the remaining obstacles, adopt the recognition of professional qualifications and establish business incentives linked to productivity." (Translation) vs. "approve the recognition of professional qualifications and establish business incentives linked to productivity." (Interpretation) - 口譯省略了「remove the remaining obstacles」，直接進入後續動作。
- 詞彙選擇 (Lexical Choice)：