108 年 國立臺灣大學外文學系碩士班《專業英文(A)》

📄 試題原卷 免費註冊後即可對照原始考卷 PDF免費註冊

第 11 題

"...It was observed by Plato that written composition 'is very like painting; for the creatures of painting stand like living beings, but if one asks them a question, they preserve a solemn silence. And so it is with written words; you might think they spoke as if they had intelligence, but if you question them, wishing to know about their sayings, they always say only one and the same thing. And every word, when once it is written, is bandied about, alike among those who understand and those who have no interest in it, and it knows not to whom to speak or not to speak; when ill-treated or unjustly reviled it always needs its father to help it; for it has no power to protect or help itself (Phaedrus, 275D-E). Writing is but an image of living speech, and, like all images for Plato, is fragile and fluctuating and will perish if the author is not there to reassert its meanings when it is abused. Though Plato is distinguishing his philosophical dialectic from artistically written speeches, codes of law, and poems, he is indirectly drawing attention to the precarious existence of literary compositions, which, in turn, suggests the principal functions of literary studies.

A working definition of literary studies can be stated, like an old-fashioned telegram, in seven words or less: The understanding and preservation of literary texts. Most would accede to such general objectives, but perhaps without realizing the most important corollary: that understanding and preservation are mutually prerequisite, and hence correlative. For, if the meaning of the text be misunderstood, its lexical form will gradually vary, through emendation, in accord with the subsequent meanings attributed to it; if the text becomes corrupt, it will cause mistaken interpretations of its meaning. Plato's great contribution to literary studies, however trivial he may have considered most of them, was his insight into the nature of the word (logos): that its preservation is coincident with its intelligibility, and that permanence and intelligibility exist in an eternal present where they are continually re-experienced as functions of one another. The mind seeks self-preservation in what can be understood, however little that may be, and its self-expression, however briefly, strives for permanence, whether experience be contemplated by a Platonist or a pragmatist."

Taking the above passage as your point of departure or as your cue, write an essay with a proper title elaborating 1) the objectives of literary studies as you understand them and 2) the significance or relevance of literary studies to your academic/life pursuit.

登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。

這一題的完整詳解

本題為一篇英文作文題,要求考生根據提供的關於柏拉圖對書寫的看法及其延伸到文學研究的論述,寫一篇標題適當的英文論文。論文需闡述兩點:

  1. 考生對文學研究目標的理解。
  2. 文學研究對考生學術或人生追求的意義與關聯性。

解題思路與寫作建議:

  1. 理解題幹核心論點:

    • 柏拉圖將書寫比喻為繪畫,認為書寫的文字如同「活生生」的形象,但缺乏生命力,無法回應提問,只能重複相同內容。
    • 書寫的文字是「活的語言」的影像,脆弱且易逝,若作者不在場,其意義可能被濫用或誤解。
    • 這段論述引出了文學研究的主要功能:理解 (understanding) 與 保存 (preservation) 文學文本。
    • 這兩者是相輔相成、相互依存的。若文本意義被誤解,其形式可能隨之改變;若文本內容腐敗,則會導致誤讀。
    • 柏拉圖的見解在於,文本的「保存」與其「可理解性」是同步的,兩者在一個持續不斷的「永恆現在」中相互作用。
    • 人類心靈尋求自我保存,透過理解來獲得安全感;透過自我表達,即使短暫,也追求永恆性。
  2. 闡述文學研究的目標 (Objectives of Literary Studies):

    • 核心目標: 根據文本,首要目標是「理解與保存文學文本」。
    • 深入理解: 這不僅是字面上的理解,更包含對文本的歷史、文化、哲學、美學等背景的深入探究,以掌握其多層次的意義。
    • 批判性詮釋: 文學研究應培養讀者批判性思考的能力,分析文本的結構、語言、修辭,以及作者的意圖與讀者的接受。
    • 保存與傳承: 透過研究、詮釋、評論、教育等方式,確保文學遺產得以延續,並在當代社會中保持其生命力與價值。
    • 連結與對話: 促進文本與讀者、文本與時代、不同文本之間,以及不同學科之間的對話,豐富我們對人性的理解。
    • 美學體驗: 文學研究也關乎對文學作品美學價值的欣賞與體驗,提升讀者的感性與人文素養。
  3. 論述文學研究的意義與關聯性 (Significance/Relevance to Academic/Life Pursuit):

    • 學術追求:
      • 跨學科整合: 文學研究常與歷史、哲學、社會學、心理學、語言學、藝術史等學科交叉,有助於培養跨學科的視野和研究能力。
🔒

後續完整解題步驟與【答案】

免費註冊,享三天全站完整詳解閱覽。

免費註冊

其他考古題