114 年 國立政治大學英國語文學系碩士班文學組《文學作品分析》
第 1 題
[What lips my lips have kissed, and where, and why]
by Edna St. Vincent Millay
What lips my lips have kissed, and where, and why,
I have forgotten, and what arms have lain
Under my head till morning; but the rain
Is full of ghosts tonight, that tap and sigh
Upon the glass and listen for reply,
And in my heart there stirs a quiet pain
For unremembered lads that not again
Will turn to me at midnight with a cry.
Thus in the winter stands the lonely tree,
Nor knows what birds have vanished one by one,
Yet knows its boughs more silent than before:
I cannot say what loves have come and gone,
I only know that summer sang in me
A little while, that in me sings no more.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這是一首關於愛情、記憶與時間流逝的詩,探討詩人對於過往情事的遺忘與情感的失落。
詩歌開頭,詩人便直接點出對過往親密關係的遺忘:「What lips my lips have kissed, and where, and why, / I have forgotten」(我已忘記,我的唇吻過多少唇,在哪裡,又為何)。這種遺忘不僅止於身體的親密,也包含情感的連結:「and what arms have lain / Under my head till morning」。然而,儘管記憶模糊,過去的情感經驗卻如同「ghosts」(鬼魂)般在雨夜中敲打著窗戶,引發內心的「quiet pain」(一絲寧靜的痛苦)。這種痛苦源於對「unremembered lads」(被遺忘的青年)的思念,他們曾是詩人生命中的一部分,如今卻已不再。
第 2 題
II.
by Marilyn Hacker
You rang me up this morning from Marseilles
echoing other lines and other lives.
The best-intentioned women sound like wives
sometimes: why couldn't I find something to say
but "When will you be back?" Above the play-
ground, like a capsuled world, a plane
heads, fortunately, north. Fresh after rain
the sky is innocently blue. Away
from frisking kids, including mine, I write
stretched on a handkerchief of pungent dry
grass, wishing I could take off my shirt.
I word old wounds. As usual, they hurt
less. Iva's giving someone's bike a try.
We could be on a plane tomorrow night.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這首詩描寫了詩人接到一通來自馬賽的電話,並藉此引發對關係、時間、空間以及個人處境的思考。
詩歌開頭,詩人便點出電話來自「Marseilles」(馬賽),這通電話「echoing other lines and other lives」(呼應著其他線條與其他生命),暗示著這通電話可能連結著過去的關係或未來的可能性。詩人提到「The best-intentioned women sound like wives」(最富善意的女性聽起來像妻子),這句帶有諷刺意味,似乎在質疑或反思女性在關係中的角色與期待。隨後,詩人自問:「why couldn't I find something to say / but 'When will you be back?'」(為什麼我找不到別的話說,除了「你什麼時候回來?」),這顯示出對話中的一種無力感或關係中的懸念。
畫面轉移到詩人所在的現場,天空「innocently blue」(純真地藍),與遠方「a plane / heads, fortunately, north」(一架飛機,幸運地,朝北飛去)形成對比,暗示著某種自由或逃
第 3 題
Insomnia
by Elizabeth Bishop
The moon in the bureau mirror
looks out a million miles
(and perhaps with pride, at herself,
but she never, never smiles)
far and away beyond sleep, or
perhaps she's a daytime sleeper.
By the Universe deserted,
she'd tell it to go to hell,
and she'd find a body of water,
or a mirror, on which to dwell.
So wrap up care in a cobweb
and drop it down the well
into that world inverted
where left is always right,
where the shadows are really the body,
where we stay awake all night,
where the heavens are shallow as the sea
is now deep, and you love me.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這首詩以「失眠」為題,透過對月亮意象的描寫,探討了孤獨、疏離、以及現實與想像世界的界線。
詩歌開頭,詩人將目光投向「bureau mirror」(梳妝台的鏡子)中的月亮。這個月亮「looks out a million miles」(望出百萬英里),並且「far and away beyond sleep」(遙遠,超越睡眠)。月亮被賦予了擬人化的特質,似乎帶著「pride」(驕傲),但卻「never, never smiles」(從不,從不微笑),這暗示著一種永恆的孤寂與冷漠。月亮甚至被想像成一個「daytime sleeper」(白天睡覺的人),進一步強調了它與日常世界的疏離。
接著,詩人假設如果月亮被「Universe deserted」(宇宙拋棄),它會「tell it to go to hell」(叫宇宙去見鬼),並尋找一個「body of water, / or a mirror」(水體,或一面鏡子)來「dwell」(棲身)。這描寫了月亮即使在孤獨中,也尋求一種映照與存在的方式,它對自身的存在感有著強烈的要求。
第 4 題
Why I Will Not Get Out of Bed
by James Tate
My muscles unravel
like spools of ribbon:
there is not a shadow
of pain. I will pose
like this for the rest
of the afternoon,
for the remainder
of all noons. The rain
is making a valley
of my dim features.
I am in Albania.
I am on the Rhine.
It is autumn,
I smell the rain,
I see children running
through columbine.
I am honey.
I am several winds.
My nerves dissolve.
My limbs wither-
I don't love you.
I don't love you.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這首詩以「我為何不起床」為題,透過一種極致的鬆弛與想像,描寫了詩人對現實的逃避和對內在世界的沉浸。
詩歌開頭,詩人便描繪了身體的狀態:「My muscles unravel / like spools of ribbon」(我的肌肉鬆開/像絲帶的捲軸)。這種鬆弛感是如此徹底,以至於「there is not a shadow / of pain」(沒有一絲痛苦的陰影)。詩人決定「I will pose / like this for the rest / of the afternoon, / for the remainder / of all noons」(我將保持這個樣子/直到下午結束/直到所有中午的其餘時間),這是一種對時間的全然放棄,一種對靜止狀態的追求。
詩人運用了強烈的想像力,將自己置於各種情境中:
- 「The rain / is making a valley / of my dim features」(雨水/正在將我的黯淡面容/塑造成一個山谷)。這是一種對外在環境與內在感受的奇特融合,雨水模糊了面容,如同山谷般深邃。
- 「I am in Albania. / I am on the Rhine.」(我在阿爾巴尼亞。/我在萊茵河上。)這兩個地理位置的並置,打破了空間的限制,暗示著詩人內心的自由與超脫。
第 5 題50 分
Part I. (50%) Write a short essay in English comparing and contrasting the views on love, locations, and memory
in two of the following four poems.
1.
[What lips my lips have kissed, and where, and why]
by Edna St. Vincent Millay
What lips my lips have kissed, and where, and why,
I have forgotten, and what arms have lain
Under my head till morning; but the rain
Is full of ghosts tonight, that tap and sigh
Upon the glass and listen for reply,
And in my heart there stirs a quiet pain
For unremembered lads that not again
Will turn to me at midnight with a cry.
Thus in the winter stands the lonely tree,
Nor knows what birds have vanished one by one,
Yet knows its boughs more silent than before:
I cannot say what loves have come and gone,
I only know that summer sang in me
A little while, that in me sings no more.
2.
II.
by Marilyn Hacker
You rang me up this morning from Marseilles
echoing other lines and other lives.
The best-intentioned women sound like wives
sometimes: why couldn't I find something to say
but "When will you be back?" Above the play-
ground, like a capsuled world, a plane
heads, fortunately, north. Fresh after rain
the sky is innocently blue. Away
from frisking kids, including mine, I write
stretched on a handkerchief of pungent dry
grass, wishing I could take off my shirt.
I word old wounds. As usual, they hurt
less. Iva's giving someone's bike a try.
We could be on a plane tomorrow night.
3.
Insomnia
by Elizabeth Bishop
The moon in the bureau mirror
looks out a million miles
(and perhaps with pride, at herself,
but she never, never smiles)
far and away beyond sleep, or
perhaps she's a daytime sleeper.
By the Universe deserted,
she'd tell it to go to hell,
and she'd find a body of water,
or a mirror, on which to dwell.
So wrap up care in a cobweb
and drop it down the well
into that world inverted
where left is always right,
where the shadows are really the body,
where we stay awake all night,
where the heavens are shallow as the sea
is now deep, and you love me.
4.
Why I Will Not Get Out of Bed
by James Tate
My muscles unravel
like spools of ribbon:
there is not a shadow
of pain. I will pose
like this for the rest
of the afternoon,
for the remainder
of all noons. The rain
is making a valley
of my dim features.
I am in Albania.
I am on the Rhine.
It is autumn,
I smell the rain,
I see children running
through columbine.
I am honey.
I am several winds.
My nerves dissolve.
My limbs wither-
I don't love you.
I don't love you.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這是一道要求比較分析的申論題,旨在評估考生對文學作品的理解、比較能力以及英文寫作能力。考生需要從四首詩中選擇兩首,深入比較和對比它們在「愛」、「地點」、「記憶」這三個主題上的觀點。
核心概念:
文學作品的比較分析、主題探討(愛、地點、記憶)、文本細節支持論點、英文學術寫作。
解題策略:
-
理解題目要求: 題目要求考生「比較和對比」(comparing and contrasting)兩首詩在「愛」(love)、
「地點」(locations)和「記憶」(memory)這三個主題上的觀點。考生需要撰寫一篇「簡短的英文論文」(short essay)。 -
詩歌速讀與主題篩選:
- Millay (Poem 1):
- 愛 (Love): 過去的愛被遺忘,但留下失落感。Summer 象徵熱情已逝。
- 地點 (Locations): 未明確提及具體地點,但「winter」暗示季節與心境。
- 記憶 (Memory): 遺忘是關鍵,但遺忘引發痛苦,記憶的缺席即是記憶本身。
- Hacker (Poem 2):
- 愛 (Love): 關係中的懸念("When will you be back?"),女性角色(wives),電話連結不同「lives」。
- 地點 (Locations): Marseilles(來電處),暗示著遠距離與連結。
- 記憶 (Memory): 「old wounds」(舊傷),透過書寫處理。
- Bishop (Poem 3):
- 愛 (Love): 在虛幻世界中的「and you love me」(而你愛我),作為孤獨的慰藉。
- 地點 (Locations): 鏡子(bureau mirror)、水體、井,象徵內省與逃離。
- 記憶 (Memory): 失眠引發對現實的疏離,對「care」(憂慮)的拋棄。
- Tate (Poem 4):
- 愛 (Love): 最終的斷絕「I don't love you.」,為了維護內在的自由。
- 地點 (Locations): Albania, Rhine(想像中的地點),打破地理限制。
- 記憶 (Memory): 逃避現實,沉浸於身體的鬆弛與想像。
- Millay (Poem 1):
-
選擇兩首詩進行比較: 考生可以選擇任何兩首,但要確保兩首詩在主題上能產生較有意義的比較對比。例如:
- Millay (遺忘的愛與失落) vs. Hacker (關係懸念與舊傷)
- Millay (記憶的失落) vs. Bishop (失眠中的情感慰藉)
- Hacker (處理舊傷) vs. Tate (逃避現實與情感斷絕)
- Bishop (虛幻的愛) vs. Tate (決絕的「不愛」)
-
構思論文結構:
- Introduction: 簡介所選的兩首詩,點出它們共同探討的主題(愛、地點、記憶),並提出你的論點(thesis statement),說明兩首詩在這些主題上的主要異同。
- Body Paragraphs (至少三段,分別討論愛、地點、記憶):
- Paragraph 1: Love: 比較兩首詩對「愛」的觀點。例如,Millay 描寫的是逝去的、被遺忘的愛,帶來失落感;而 Bishop 描寫的是在虛幻中尋求的愛,作為孤獨的慰藉。
- Paragraph 2: Locations: 比較兩首詩對「地點」的處理。例如,Hacker 的 Marseilles 是現實的聯結點,而 Bishop 的鏡子和井是內省或逃離的象徵。
- Paragraph 3: Memory: 比較兩首詩對「記憶」的態度。例如,Millay 的遺忘卻引發痛苦,Hacker 透過書寫處理「old wounds」,而 Tate 則選擇逃避,不讓記憶或情感干擾當下的狀態。
- Conclusion: 總結你的比較分析,重申你的論點,並對兩首詩的主題深度做一個簡短的評論。
-
撰寫英文論文:
- 使用清晰、準確的學術英文。
- 引用詩歌中的具體詞句(引文)來支持你的論點。
- 注意段落之間的連貫性與邏輯性。
- 注意文法、拼寫和標點符號。
範例寫作方向 (以 Millay 和 Bishop 為例):
- Introduction: This essay will compare and contrast Edna St. Vincent Millay's "[What lips my lips have kissed, and wh
第 6 題25 分
Part II. Answer these two questions separately in well-formed paragraphs in English.
- What happens at the end of this story: does the man get a new name, or does the narrator get a new man?
Explain your interpretation of the ending; use details from the story to support your interpretation. (25%)
I Get Smart
by Pamela Painter
I tell him I'm thinking about getting a new cat.
"No way," he says, like this is not negotiable. As if I haven't paid half the rent
since grad school, and all the cat costs, including the spiffy new cat door installed next to
the fridge.
I say I've been to the Animal Rescue League and they have seventeen adorable
kittens-all colors. "You get to pick the color," I say.
"Hold it," he says. He lines up his sharp accountant's pencil across the top of his
crossword, cracks the knuckles of his right hand. "I do not want another cat. What's
wrong with the three we've got?"
The three we've got hear our voices rising and pad into the kitchen to see what's
going on. The Persian, Jeanette, threads back and forth through my legs, her long air
flying, while gray-striped Fitzhugh leaps onto the fridge and blinks down at us.
Sweetpeach, the calico, jumps into my lap and kneads my chenille stomach. Not a cat
goes near Roy.
"There's nothing wrong with the three we've got," I say.
"So forget a new cat," he says, and turns back to his crossword.
I scratch behind Sweetpeach's ears to make her purr, and finish my Sunday
morning pot of real coffee. I've already finished a Xerox of Roy's crossword and I know
just which word will hang him up.
Next Sunday during crosswords and coffee I make the introductions. I say, "Well,
we now have three new cats."
Roy gets macho, points his pencil at me. "Where the hell-I told you..."
I tell him, calm down, don't get all riled up before you meet them. But his voice
rises in spite of my attempts to keep the peace. So my voice rises, too, as in any proper
duet, and sure enough the cats come by.
"This is Savannah," I say as Sweetpeach appears, her tail whipping the air,
weighing my distress.
Roy snorts and I try to remember if he ever called the cats by name.
"And that is Joe Namath." I point to Fitzhugh eyeing us from the top of the fridge
where he is poised in a three-point stance. "He never acted like a Fitzhugh," I say.
Parents should change their kids' names every few years for just that reason. Or give
them nicknames."
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
核心觀念
本題考查短篇小說的結尾解讀,重點包括:
- 敘事者可靠性與敘事視角:全文由第一人稱女性敘事者講述,讀者只能透過她的觀察理解 Roy,因此必須注意她如何重新命名、安排家庭成員。
- 反諷與語意雙關:標題 I Get Smart 同時表示「我變聰明了」與「我學會反擊、取得主導權」。
- 命名的象徵功能:姓名代表身分與權力。替貓改名,不只是改稱呼,也象徵敘事者重新界定牠們在家庭中的位置。
- 開放式結尾:故事沒有明寫分手、搬家或出現新男性,因此結尾須依照可觀察的行動與意象判斷,而不能任意補充情節。
解題方法
解讀結尾時,應依序檢查三件事:
第一,確認結尾真正發生的事件。敘事者宣布「現在我們有三隻新貓」,但她指向的其實是原本已經存在的貓。Sweetpeach 被重新命名為 Savannah,Fitzhugh 被重新命名為 Joe Namath。所謂「新」,並非新買了貓,而是透過改名製造新的身分。
第二,觀察敘事者與 Roy 的權力關係。故事開頭 Roy 以「No way」直接否定她添購新貓的想法,甚至用鉛筆指向她,顯示他習慣以命令方式掌控家庭決定。然而敘事者已經支付一半房租及所有養貓費用,三隻貓也都親近她,沒有一隻靠近 Roy。表面上 Roy 掌握發言權,實際上家庭中的情感與生活秩序都由敘事者支撐。
第三,判斷題目所問的兩種結局哪一種有文本根據。故事中沒有新男性出現,也沒有敘事者離開 Roy 的明確行動;相反地,全文反覆鋪陳「命名」與「改變身分」。因此,較有力的解讀是:男人並未被另一個男人取代,而是被納入敘事者重新命名、重新分類的家庭秩序中。
文本證據分析
- 貓與敘事者形成親密聯盟
三隻貓在爭吵時一起走進廚房,Jeanette 在她腳邊穿梭,Fitzhugh 跳上冰箱,Sweetpeach 則跳進她懷裡。這些動作呈現貓與敘事者之間的親密關係。相對地,原文特別指出:「Not a cat goes near Roy.」這句簡短的否定句將 Roy 孤立出來,使他像是這個家庭中的局外人。
- Roy 的名字本身缺乏家庭意義
敘事者說:「I try to remember if he ever called the cats by name.」這表示 Roy 甚至沒有真正認識或尊重三隻貓的個別身分。他只把牠們視為「三隻貓」,而敘事者則熟悉牠們的名字、外貌與性格。命名權因此成為兩人差異的核心:Roy 只想管理數量,敘事者掌握具體身分。
第 7 題25 分
Part II. Answer these two questions separately in well-formed paragraphs in English.
2) What are the two views of names in the story? Explain both, using details from the story to support your answer. (25%)
I Get Smart
by Pamela Painter
I tell him I'm thinking about getting a new cat.
"No way," he says, like this is not negotiable. As if I haven't paid half the rent
since grad school, and all the cat costs, including the spiffy new cat door installed next to
the fridge.
I say I've been to the Animal Rescue League and they have seventeen adorable
kittens-all colors. "You get to pick the color," I say.
"Hold it," he says. He lines up his sharp accountant's pencil across the top of his
crossword, cracks the knuckles of his right hand. "I do not want another cat. What's
wrong with the three we've got?"
The three we've got hear our voices rising and pad into the kitchen to see what's
going on. The Persian, Jeanette, threads back and forth through my legs, her long air
flying, while gray-striped Fitzhugh leaps onto the fridge and blinks down at us.
Sweetpeach, the calico, jumps into my lap and kneads my chenille stomach. Not a cat
goes near Roy.
"There's nothing wrong with the three we've got," I say.
"So forget a new cat," he says, and turns back to his crossword.
I scratch behind Sweetpeach's ears to make her purr, and finish my Sunday
morning pot of real coffee. I've already finished a Xerox of Roy's crossword and I know
just which word will hang him up.
Next Sunday during crosswords and coffee I make the introductions. I say, "Well,
we now have three new cats."
Roy gets macho, points his pencil at me. "Where the hell-I told you..."
I tell him, calm down, don't get all riled up before you meet them. But his voice
rises in spite of my attempts to keep the peace. So my voice rises, too, as in any proper
duet, and sure enough the cats come by.
"This is Savannah," I say as Sweetpeach appears, her tail whipping the air,
weighing my distress.
Roy snorts and I try to remember if he ever called the cats by name.
"And that is Joe Namath." I point to Fitzhugh eyeing us from the top of the fridge
where he is poised in a three-point stance. "He never acted like a Fitzhugh," I say.
Parents should change their kids' names every few years for just that reason. Or give
them nicknames."
"It's the other way around," Roy says. Kids names Moonbeam, Taj Mahal, and
Free are now calling themselves Susie, Pat, and Jim."
"You see," I say.
"No," he says. "I don't." His eyes refuse to focus on me or on the cats. He lets his
coffee get cold.
Jeanette springs onto the counter and highsteps over the stove to the window
where she watches the action at our veggie neighbor's high-tech cat-proof birdfeeder. I
tell Roy he'll be sure to remember her name. "You're always saying 'what a pill.' So
that's pillow."
"Don't do this," he says.
"So we have not one but three new cats," I say, burying my nose in Savannah's
spotted fur. She's'as limp as her new name and warm. Her cat's eyes seem to remember
hot African grasslands and prey ten times larger than she is.
"We have three cats-period," Roy says. He has a way of making syntax dull.
"Three new cats," I say.
"Bull!" Roy's pencil bounces high like a cat toy.
Joe Namath jumps from the fridge onto the table and skids into Roy's crossword.
Roy's tackle is rough and Joe Namath spits as Roy tosses him into the dining room.
Pillow, the bird-watcher, cantilevers one ear around to hear when to abandon her post.
Roy scoops his pencil from the floor and taps his crossword in disgust. Three words
earlier he went wrong, but he won't know this until I tell him. I shiver Savannah off my
lap and leave to shower.
During the next two weeks, Roy gets mad every time I call the cats by their new
names. But he is more mad that Savannah, Joe Namath, and Pillow take to their names
so quickly. It's all in the tone of voice, I tell him.
I get happy with my new cats.
After a couple of months I get smart. Come Sunday breakfast it isn't Roy filling
in the crossword; it's a new man-better with words and cats-named Ralph.
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
核心觀念
本題考查「名字」在故事中的兩種相反觀點:名字究竟只是方便指稱的標籤,還是能賦予身分、塑造關係與改變現實的力量。答題時須分別說明敘事者與 Roy 的立場,並連結角色對三隻貓改名後的反應,以及結尾 Roy 被「新男人 Ralph」取代的情節。
解題方法
先從對話找出兩人直接表達的命名觀,再以行動驗證其立場。敘事者主動把 Jeanette、Fitzhugh、Sweetpeach 改稱 Pillow、Joe Namath、Savannah,視改名為創造「新貓」的行為;Roy 堅持三隻貓的本質與數量都沒有變,因而否定名稱能改變事物。最後將命名衝突延伸至人際關係:敘事者以同一套邏輯稱 Roy 為 Ralph,使原本停滯的關係被重新定義。
兩種命名觀的對照
| 觀點 | 代表人物 | 名字的意義 | 文本證據 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 名字能創造或改變身分 | 敘事者 | 名字帶有想像、情感與關係力量,能使對象成為「新的」存在 | 她替三隻舊貓改名,並宣告家中有「三隻新貓」;最後將 Roy 稱為 Ralph |
| 名字只是外在標籤 | Roy | 名字無法改變對象本質;同一隻貓仍是同一隻貓 | 他反覆強調「我們有三隻貓——句點」,拒絕承認改名後出現「新貓」 |
詳解
敘事者認為名字具有創造性與轉化性的力量。她不把名字看成中性的辨識符號,而把它視為對一個存在重新想像、重新建立關係的方式。她將 Sweetpeach 命名為 Savannah,因為牠的斑點毛色與姿態使她聯想到非洲草原;將 Fitzhugh 改為 Joe Namath,因為牠蹲在冰箱上的姿勢像美式足球員;又將 Jeanette 改為 Pillow,因為 Roy 常說牠「令人討厭」,而她把這句評語轉化為較溫和、甚至帶有趣味的名字。這些名字不是隨意替換,而是從貓的外貌、動作與人類賦予牠們的情感意義中產生。因此,她堅稱家中「有三隻新貓」:肉體雖未更換,名字改變後,貓在她的感知與關係中已成為新的對象。
敘事者也相信命名的效果取決於說話者的態度。她說貓很快接受新名字,「全在於語氣」。這句話指出名字的力量不是字音本身,而是親密、注意與情感投注所形成的互動。貓回應 Savannah、Joe Namath、Pillow,象徵牠們進入敘事者所建立的新關係秩序。她的命名行動同時是反抗 Roy 控制欲的行動:Roy 先前直接否決她想養新貓的願望,並以武斷口氣宣稱此事「不可協商」。