108 年 國立成功大學臺灣文學研究所《外文文學文獻解讀(英文)》
第 1 題25 分
This text is an excerpt from "The Past as Legacy and Project: Postcolonial Criticism in the Perspective of Indigenous Criticism" by Arif Dirlik. Pls translate and interpret. Use examples from Taiwan to illustrate his points if you can.
"The historicity of identity does not make it any the less whole, nor does the constructedness of the past make it any the less significant in shaping history. Each generation may rewrite history, but it does so under conditions where it receives as its historical endowment previous generations' constructions of the past. For the marginalized and oppressed in particular, whose histories have been erased by power, it becomes all the more important to recapture or remake the past in their efforts to render themselves visible historically, as the very struggle to become visible presupposes a historical identity. In the face of a "historiographic colonialism" that denies them their historicity, capturing the truth of history, of oppression and the resistance to it, is a fundamental task that for its accomplishment requires constant reference to the precolonial past. But it is also the case that those who are engaged in a struggle for identity can least afford to dehistoricize or reify the past, for the struggle is always the struggle for the present and must address not just the legacy of the past but also problems of the present."
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這題要求考生翻譯並闡釋 Arif Dirlik 的文章段落,並舉台灣的例子來說明。核心概念在於「歷史性」(historicity)與「身份認同」(identity)的關係,以及邊緣化群體如何透過「重塑過去」(remake the past)來爭取能見度(visibility)與歷史認同。
核心觀念解析:
- 歷史性與身份認同的關係: 作者指出,身份認同的「歷史性」(即其歷史構成與演變)並不損害其完整性,過去的「建構性」(constructedness)對於形塑歷史至關重要。每一代人都可能重寫歷史,但這種重寫是在繼承前代人對過去的建構的基礎上進行的。
- 邊緣化群體的歷史鬥爭: 對於被權力壓迫、歷史被抹去的邊緣化群體而言,重拾或重塑過去變得尤為重要,這是他們讓自己在歷史上「顯現」(render themselves visible)的努力。這種爭取能見度的鬥爭本身就預設了一種歷史身份。
- 「歷史書寫殖民主義」(Historiographic Colonialism): 作者提到一種「歷史書寫殖民主義」,這種主義否認邊緣化群體的歷史性。在此情況下,掌握歷史真相、壓迫與抵抗的真實,就成為一項基本任務,需要不斷回溯前殖民時代的歷史。
- 避免「去歷史化」或「物化」過去: 然而,作者也強調,那些正在為身份認同而奮鬥的人,最不能做的就是「去歷史化」(dehistoricize)或「物化」(reify)過去。因為爭取身份認同的鬥爭,本質上是為現在而鬥爭,必須同時處理過去的遺產和現在的問題。
翻譯與闡釋:
這段文字的核心論點是,過去的建構與歷史性對於當代身份的形成至關重要,尤其是對於那些歷史被壓迫者而言,重新詮釋和掌握過去是爭取自身在歷史上合法地位的關鍵。然而,這種對過去的爭取,不應是簡單地照搬或僵化歷史,而應是為了更好地理解和解決當下的處境。
第 2 題25 分
Please translate and interpret. From Orientalism by Said.
"I have spent a great deal of my life during the past thirty-five years advocating the rights of the Palestinian
people to national self-determination, but I have always tried to do that with full attention paid to the reality
of the Jewish people and what they suffered by the way of persecution and genocide. The paramount thing is
that the struggle for equality in Palestine/Israel should be directed toward a humane goal, that is, coexistence,
and not further suppression and denial. Not accidentally, I indicate that Orientalism and modern
anti-Semitism have common roots. Therefore, it would seem to be a vital necessity for independent
intellectuals always to provide alternative models to the reductively simplifying and confining ones, based on
mutual hostility, that have prevailed in the Middle East and elsewhere for so long....
The secular world is the world of history as made by human beings. Human agency is subject to investigation
and analysis, which it is the mission of understanding to apprehend, criticize, influence, and judge. Above all,
critical thought does not submit to state power or to commands to join in the ranks marching against one or
another approved enemy. Rather than the manufactured clash of civilizations, we need to concentrate on the
slow working together of cultures that overlap, borrow from each other, and live together in far more
interesting ways than any abridged or inauthentic mode of understanding can allow. But for that kind of wider
perception we need time and patient and skeptical inquiry, supported by faith in communities of interpretation
that are difficult to sustain in a world demanding instant action and reaction."
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這題要求考生翻譯並闡釋愛德華·薩依德(Edward Said)《東方主義》(Orientalism)一書中的一段文字,並從中提煉出其核心思想。薩依德在此段落中,結合了自身對巴勒斯坦人民權利的倡導,以及對猶太人民苦難的關懷,探討了「東方主義」與反猶主義的關聯,並強調獨立知識分子的批判性角色,以及對「文明衝突」論的質疑。
核心觀念解析:
- 巴勒斯坦權益與猶太人民苦難的關聯: 薩依德以他長年倡導巴勒斯坦人民自決權的經驗出發,強調在追求公平的過程中,必須同時關注猶太人民遭受的迫害與種族滅絕的歷史。他認為,在巴勒斯坦/以色列的鬥爭,應導向「共存」(coexistence)的目標,而非進一步的壓迫與否認。
- 東方主義與反猶主義的共同根源: 薩依德指出,「東方主義」(Orientalism)與現代「反猶主義」(anti-Semitism)具有共同的根源。這暗示了兩種意識形態都可能建立在對他者的刻板化、負面建構和系統性歧視之上。
- 獨立知識分子的批判性角色: 薩依德強調,獨立知識分子有必要提供「替代性模型」(alternative models),來對抗那些基於敵對、簡化和限制性思維的既有觀點,特別是那些在中東等地長期存在的觀點。
第 3 題25 分
請把以下中文文字翻譯成英文。
小雪空手返鄉,文凱捧一束包著玻璃紙的玫瑰,和孩子們在機場等了一上午接她回家。那花,她
捨不得丟,晾乾後倒掛在前廊,不過秋涼多雨,枯黃的花束看來委靡可憐,風華已逝。
去年,文凱和小雪的弟弟也曾共赴越南開礦,又累又危險,一個月的收入六千元,爆破入坑都是提
著脖子不要命的工作,苦撐三個月還是打包回家了。媽媽說,男人有家有小孩,還是別賣命。她問過
文凱要不要去台灣,他不要,覺得人生地不熟,風險更勝礦坑。
「他被寵壞了,不會想,不知道我在馬來西亞在台灣有多苦,捨不得花錢,捨不得休息,錢全存給
家裡。只看到我拿錢回家,不知道我要賺這些錢多麼不容易。」
每個海外打工的人,都有這一層辛酸。渴望一種貼近的理解,那種不可言傳的、相濡以沫的、有淚
卻不曾真正留下的,人在異地的徬徨與掙扎。這個認識的落差,無以言傳,難以交流,唯有親身經歷。
顧玉玲,《回家》第五章〈浮木〉,新北市:INK印刻文學,2014,頁382。
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
這題是翻譯題,要求將一段中文敘事翻譯成英文。翻譯的重點在於捕捉原文的情感、語氣和細節,同時確保英文表達的自然流暢,並符合文學翻譯的標準。
翻譯與闡釋:
這段文字描寫了一個家庭的離散與重聚,以及海外工作者的辛酸。核心情感是親人之間的思念、勞動的艱辛、以及因生活經歷不同而產生的隔閡與不被理解。
逐段翻譯與解析:
-
"小雪空手返鄉,文凱捧一束包著玻璃紙的玫瑰,和孩子們在機場等了一上午接她回家。那花,她捨不得丟,晾乾後倒掛在前廊,不過秋涼多雨,枯黃的花束看來委靡可憐,風華已逝。"
- 翻譯考量: 「空手返鄉」指沒有攜帶禮物或顯著的行李,可能帶有某種落寞感。「捧一束包著玻璃紙的玫瑰」是具體的描寫。「等了一上午」強調時間的漫長和期待。「晾乾後倒掛在前廊」展現了對花的珍惜。「枯黃」、「委靡可憐」、「風華已逝」是描寫花朵狀態的關鍵詞,帶有時間流逝和美好不再的感傷。
- 參考譯文: Xiao Xue returned home empty-handed. Wen Kai, holding a bouquet of roses wrapped in cellophane, waited with their children at the airport for the whole morning to pick her up. She couldn't bear to discard the flowers, so she dried them and hung them upside down on the front porch. However, with the cool, rainy autumn, the withered yellow bouquet looked pathetic and forlorn, its former glory long gone.
-
"去年,文凱和小雪的弟弟也曾共赴越南開礦,又累又危險,一個月的收入六千元,爆破入坑都是提著脖子不要命的工作,苦撐三個月還是打包回家了。媽媽說,男人有家有小孩,還是別賣命。她問過文凱要不要去台灣,他不要,覺得人生地不熟,風險更勝礦坑。"
- 翻譯考量: 「共赴越南開礦」說明了工作的地點和性質。「又累又危險」是直接的描述。「一個月的收入六千元」是具體數字,需保留。「爆破入坑」是危險的作業。「提著脖子不要命的工作」是強烈的比喻,強調生命的危險性。「苦撐三個月」是時間。「打包回家」表示結束工作。「別賣命」是媽媽的勸告,語氣直接。「人生地不熟」是關鍵的陌生感。「風險更勝礦坑」是比較和強調。
第 4 題25 分
請閱讀完以下關於 Leonard Cohen (加拿大)詩人的評論這篇文章後,用中文寫下這篇文章的重點。
When a poet dies, his publishers often hurry into print whatever scraps lie stuffed in his
desk drawers or overflow his wastebasket. This is the book business at its darkest and most
human, but many balance sheets have been balanced by a posthumous work or two. Death is
the moment when all eyes are upon the poet for the last time; beyond, for most harmless
drudges, lies the abyss. Leonard Cohen, who died two years ago, wore many a fedora - poet,
novelist, songwriter, a singer of sorts but only the last trade, which he took up reluctantly,
made him a star.
Cohen was never taken very seriously as a poet. He wasn't much of a singer, either; but the
gravelly renderings of his lyrics gradually attracted a mass audience that seemed more like a
cult. Many found him a bit much, his heart-on-his-sleeve misery no more appealing than
plunging your hands into boiling tar. Still, songs like "Suzanne," "Bird on the Wire" and the
rather preposterous hymn of praise "Hallelujah" have been so widely covered as to be nearly
inescapable. At any moment of the day, "Suzanne" is probably playing in an elevator
somewhere.
Such songs now form the hoarse, moaning soundtrack to countless movies and television
episodes. When a Cohen song rises from some awkward silence it's a good bet the director has
run out of ideas. The religiose sentimentality and painful growl, like a halibut with strep
throat, have patched a lot of plot holes. He'll give an emulsified version of everything the
scriptwriter left unsaid.
THE FLAME
POEMS NOTEBOOKS LYRICS DRAWINGS
LEONARD COHEN
"The Flame" has a little of everything for Cohen fans and nothing for anyone else. The
publicity matter claims the stray work has been "carefully selected"; but if this is the best of
his barrel scrapings, there's not much barrel to scrape. With a plan laid down by the singer
himself, the editors have included his own choice of some 60 poems, the lyrics from his last
four albums and a long dreary selection of notebook jottings. The pages have been decorated
with 70 or so rumpled self-portraits (the singer's amour propre came streaked in
self-loathing), but a dozen amateurish doodles of young women thrown in. That perhaps
represents the internal proportions of Cohen's famous vanity and his equally famous
lechery - I mean, of course, his search for a muse variously named Marianne, Sahara,
Vanessa, Charmaine, Anjani, Mara, Sheila, Heather, Carolina and Olivia. How awful had any
of his passing fancies passed unnoticed.
The poems are monotonous scribbles of the moody-undergraduate school, what young
Werther would have sung had he been Canadian:
O apple of the world
we weren't married on the surface
we were married at the core
I can't take it anymore.
The long miseries and brief graces of love are Cohen's obsessive subject. Some famous love
poems by Bernart de Ventadorn and Dante sound almost as bad when translated, but Cohen
doesn't have that excuse. The poems might seem that much better in Provençal or Tuscan.
Cohen favors an Audenesque quatrain with none of the puckish genius Auden used to
refashion the form. What we get instead is:
And from the wall a grazing wind
weightless and serene
wounds Me as I part Her lips
and wounds Us in between
And fastened here, surrendered to
My Lover and My Lover,
We spread and drown as lilies do-
forever and forever.
Cohen loves "poetic" lines that are nearly excruciating ("And now that I kneel / At the edge of
my years / Let me fall through the mirror of love"), rhymes that would cripple a musk ox
(plug/enough, sword/2005, art/Marx), and passages the C.I.A. should use only during
enhanced interrogation (a couple "waving at desire / as it rests in the foreground /
foothill-shaped, peaceful, / devoted as a dog made of tears").
The lyrics follow in cornucopian abundance, as if Cohen were possessed by a Dionysian mania
forever unassuaged. Genial, sloppy, full of conventional lines, they sometimes have little twists
that save them from disaster. Heavy on parallels and antitheses, they're even heavier on
abstractions, the words just a syllable or two, on rare occasions three, almost never four:
The parking lot is empty
They killed the neon sign
It's dark from here to St. Jovite
It's dark all down the line.
Cohen could turn this stuff out all day, and it's not half bad; but lyrics without music, even
decent lyrics, look like dried lungfish in someone's den, mounted on varnished plaques. The
difference between his lyrics and poems is tissue-paper thin except when he was writing some
wretched approximation of free verse:
His cry his perfect word pitched against
The baffled contradictions of the heart
Wrestling them embracing them
Strangling them with a jealous conjugal desperation.
Cohen was not a poet who accidentally became a lyricist; he was a lyricist who for years fooled
himself into thinking he was a poet. As poems these squibs are worthless; as lyrics, even sung
in that lizardy groan, they often moved millions. His voice, that broken, battered thing, could
make almost any song - even "God Save the Queen," perhaps - sound lonesome, miserable,
profound. If singing badly is no bar to stardom, everyone who stands caterwauling in the
shower should take hope. You might not even need a whiskey-and-battery-acid cocktail to get
there.
The final section consists of disordered entries from the hundreds of notebooks Cohen picked
up and pitched down over the years (one was discovered in his refrigerator freezer). Fans who
have pined for wisdom like "I think, therefore I am / right up there with / Mary had a Little
Lamb" or "I was thinking / of a room in Westminster / room / with a woman from Hell / who
thought she was hot" may at last be gratified. (The book reproduces the manuscript of the
latter. That extra "room" is a bad editorial decision - Cohen was probably just trying to clarify
his handwriting.) In the notebooks, the singer writes, "Whatever happened to my place / in
the Anthology of English Literature?" The better question is, Why should he be there in the
first place?
It's hard to understand the cult of Leonard Cohen, the thousands who flocked to concert after
concert, leaving with a feeling of illumination or exaltation, the sort of things for which people
usually receive get-well cards. There are artists we don't understand whom we are happy for
others to love, and artists who attract an adoration that seems such a colossal mistake we can
only shake our heads in bewilderment. Those who love Cohen may find in this gallimaufry the
answer to their prayers. For everyone else, the only proper reaction is to shutter the windows
and wait for the fever to pass.
William Logan is the author, most recently, of "Dickinson's Nerves, Frost's Woods: Poetry in the Shadow of
the Past."
On book:
THE FLAME
Poems, Notebooks, Lyrics, Drawings
By Leonard Cohen
Edited by Robert Faggen and Alexandra Pleshoyano
277 pp. Farrar, Straus & Giroux..
登入後即可作答並保存紀錄。
核心觀念
本文是詩評家威廉・洛根對李歐納・柯恩遺作集《The Flame》的評論。文章的重點不只是介紹書中內容,也在於質疑柯恩作為詩人的文學地位,並探討他為何能吸引大批歌迷。閱讀時應分辨「評論者的批判立場」與「可確認的作品內容」:文中對柯恩詩作的貶抑,是洛根的評價,不是客觀定論。
解題方法
整理評論文章,可依序找出作者的立場、支持立場的理由,以及最後的總結。本文先以詩人死後出版遺稿的現象開場,再評論柯恩的名聲與《The Flame》各部分,最後回到柯恩的崇拜者,說明作者對這種崇拜的困惑與反感。
文章重點
-
柯恩的聲名主要來自歌手身分
柯恩兼具詩人、小說家與詞曲創作者等身分,但評論者認為,使他成為明星的是他後來勉強從事的演唱工作。他的歌聲沙啞低沉,歌曲如〈Suzanne〉、〈Bird on the Wire〉與〈Hallelujah〉廣泛流傳,形成近似狂熱崇拜的群眾文化。評論者也諷刺,影視作品常以柯恩的歌曲填補劇情空白。 -
《The Flame》的內容與編排
書中收錄柯恩親自挑選的約六十首詩、最後四張專輯的歌詞、大量筆記,以及自畫像和女性素描。評論者認為,書中材料雖然多,品質卻參差不齊;筆記缺乏整理,插圖也暴露出柯恩自戀與追逐女性繆思的形象。 -
評論者認為柯恩的詩作平庸而單調
洛根批評柯恩反覆書寫愛情的痛苦與短暫歡愉,詩句常流於陳套、矯飾,押韻生硬,情感表達也過度。他指出,柯恩採用類似奧登的四行詩形式,卻沒有奧登改造格律時的機智與創造力。